My Letter to the Editor
Monday, October 24th, 2005I read a pretty awful column in the Columbia Spectator the other day, so I decided to write a response. Lo’ and behold, they printed it without any cuts!
To the Editor:
While I am open to arguments against Jeffrey Sachs’ plans to save the world, I would not trust Chris Kulawik to make them. In his latest column (“The Cult of Sachs,� Oct. 19), Mr. Kulawik claims that the Great Society failed to help the poor, and so anything resembling it would fail in foreign countries, too. If he had reached these conclusions through responsible analysis, then perhaps he would have a point.
The statistics that Mr. Kulawik cites against the Great Society have little to do with the program he criticizes. He claims that “the poverty level, 10.1 percent in 1970, would fall a meager .1 percent to 10 percent in 1998.� Why does he choose this time period? The Great Society was a program proposed and implemented by President Lyndon Johnson. We ought to at least begin our analysis in 1964 and end it in 1969, lest we confuse the effects of the Great Society with those of dismantling it.
The official U.S. census poverty statistics—Mr. Kulawik cites the numbers for American families, not for all Americans—show that the poverty rate fell more than seven percentage points between 1963 and 1969. By that time, about 12 percent of Americans were living at or below the poverty level. More than thirty years later, roughly the same fraction of our citizens subsists at this level of real income.
Mr. Kulawik owes his readers an explanation as to how the Great Society prevented the poor from sharing in America’s economic growth in the 1960s, and he ought to explain to his editors why he backed up his claims with the wrong statistics. Perhaps once he has acknowledged these failures of logic we will listen to his suggestions on alleviating world poverty.
Adam Sacarny CC ’07