<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Krugman Defense Continued (Avoiding Assigned Reading Edition)</title>
	<link>http://www.sacarny.com/blog/2005/03/31/krugman-defense-continued-avoiding-assigned-reading-edition/</link>
	<description>Pushing bits for utility maximization</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: ChasHeath</title>
		<link>http://www.sacarny.com/blog/2005/03/31/krugman-defense-continued-avoiding-assigned-reading-edition/#comment-7142</link>
		<author>ChasHeath</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 02:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sacarny.com/blog/2005/03/31/krugman-defense-continued-avoiding-assigned-reading-edition/#comment-7142</guid>
					<description>I posted about a WSJ contradiction to the "trust fund contains only worthless IOUs".

&lt;a href="http://cent21.blogspot.com/2005/03/wsj-editors-acknowledge-value-of.html" rel="nofollow"&gt; WSJ editors &lt;/a&gt;include trust fund interest in the amount they say can be diverted to private accounts over the next ten years, and equated that income with payroll tax revenues.

So.  Conservatives consider them worthless IOUs only if they are to be used to pay currently legislated benefits, but they generate real interest payments if we legislate a new benefit to be paid to people under the age of 55, as long as they invest the benefits in stocks.

Manipulative b*$#a%@$.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted about a WSJ contradiction to the &#8220;trust fund contains only worthless IOUs&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://cent21.blogspot.com/2005/03/wsj-editors-acknowledge-value-of.html" rel="nofollow"> WSJ editors </a>include trust fund interest in the amount they say can be diverted to private accounts over the next ten years, and equated that income with payroll tax revenues.</p>
<p>So.  Conservatives consider them worthless IOUs only if they are to be used to pay currently legislated benefits, but they generate real interest payments if we legislate a new benefit to be paid to people under the age of 55, as long as they invest the benefits in stocks.</p>
<p>Manipulative b*$#a%@$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Home work</title>
		<link>http://www.sacarny.com/blog/2005/03/31/krugman-defense-continued-avoiding-assigned-reading-edition/#comment-7392</link>
		<author>Home work</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 12:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sacarny.com/blog/2005/03/31/krugman-defense-continued-avoiding-assigned-reading-edition/#comment-7392</guid>
					<description>Your information strongly has helped me, thank you for it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your information strongly has helped me, thank you for it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scarpe</title>
		<link>http://www.sacarny.com/blog/2005/03/31/krugman-defense-continued-avoiding-assigned-reading-edition/#comment-23157</link>
		<author>scarpe</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sacarny.com/blog/2005/03/31/krugman-defense-continued-avoiding-assigned-reading-edition/#comment-23157</guid>
					<description>Ich besichtige deinen Aufstellungsort wieder bald fur sicheres!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ich besichtige deinen Aufstellungsort wieder bald fur sicheres!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pkopbutgzg</title>
		<link>http://www.sacarny.com/blog/2005/03/31/krugman-defense-continued-avoiding-assigned-reading-edition/#comment-45061</link>
		<author>pkopbutgzg</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sacarny.com/blog/2005/03/31/krugman-defense-continued-avoiding-assigned-reading-edition/#comment-45061</guid>
					<description>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! gxgwemzccphanc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! gxgwemzccphanc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kir</title>
		<link>http://www.sacarny.com/blog/2005/03/31/krugman-defense-continued-avoiding-assigned-reading-edition/#comment-150697</link>
		<author>Kir</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sacarny.com/blog/2005/03/31/krugman-defense-continued-avoiding-assigned-reading-edition/#comment-150697</guid>
					<description>&lt;a&gt;  &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a>  </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.sacarny.com/blog/2005/03/31/krugman-defense-continued-avoiding-assigned-reading-edition/#comment-150732</link>
		<author>Joe</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 07:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sacarny.com/blog/2005/03/31/krugman-defense-continued-avoiding-assigned-reading-edition/#comment-150732</guid>
					<description>&lt;a&gt;  &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a>  </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
