Archive for December, 2004

Europe Responds

Monday, December 27th, 2004

This summer I worked with Thibault, the French cousin of my boss. It seems that one of his German friends grabbed a hold of his keyboard:

(16:08:25) Thibault: Allo
(16:08:34) Thibault: Wie geht es dir
(16:08:40) Thibault: geht’s
(16:08:42) Thibault: ghbtynugvty
(16:08:49) Thibault: moi aussi
(16:08:54) Thibault: tout à fait d’accord
(16:09:13) Thibault: yes c’est de la balle bébé
(16:09:22) Thibault: Es ist doch ein riesig geil
(16:10:05) Thibault: Haribo mach kinder froh und der erwachsenen eben so
(16:10:19) Thibault: It was my stupid friend*
(16:10:21) Thibault: rtlo$)e
(16:10:22) Thibault:
(16:10:24) Thibault: “é
(16:10:36) Thibault: no it’s a joke
(16:10:48) Thibault: we’re not so stupid
(16:10:52) Thibault: just german !!
(16:15:53) The conversation has become inactive and timed out.

Comparative Politics Considered Harmful

Sunday, December 19th, 2004

Update #23213, wherein an animated gif is presented, and blinking text used:

AGHGHARHGHGGHHGHGG!

%^@#$ BUSH!!!

Friday, December 10th, 2004

Brad DeLong channels Krugman on really problematic government deficits
The linked entry refers to the government without taking into account Social Security. Since Social Security is presently balanced, removing it from deficit calculations reveals a huge shortfall in the “general fund” (government minus social security). Think about this - the government only takes in 70 dollars for every 100 that it spends. To close the gap the government will need to collect about 40% more than it already does.

This is troubling, no? The U.S. government runs a deficit of around 4% of GDP (a measure of the size of an economy), which is comparable to that of some other big countries (Germany, France). But in Germany, government represents fully half of the country’s economy; in the U.S., government takes up only around a fifth. We tend to measure deficit relative to the size of the country’s economy, not relative to the size of the government. Measuring this way makes a 4% American deficit seem close to a 4% German deficit.

However, when you want to know how much taxation will have to change to cover government shortfall, it’s important to consider the current size of the government. When an entity that takes up fully half of the economy runs a 4% deficit relative to the size of the whole economy, as a single entity, it would have to raise taxes by a bit more than 8% to magically plug the shortfall. (deficit / current revenues)

The U.S. government, only taking up 1/5 of the economy, needs to close a 4% shortfall relative to 5/5 of the economy. When you end up dividing the current deficit by current revenue, the number is a ghastly 23%. (That number is smaller than the 40% from before, since we’re now including the currently balanced social security system.)

In sum: taxes on the whole would have to increase a whopping 23% (pay $1.23 for every $1 you pay right now to the federal government) to stop this year’s debt hemorrhage. For the moment, we’re getting a sweet deal. But this is all going to have to be paid back with interest. Enjoy the tax cuts while you can.

(Notes: Thank you CBO. Astute readers feel free to point out horrendous mathematical errors.)

Laguna Beach: The Real Story

Tuesday, December 7th, 2004

I just watched Laguna Beach, one of those shows that’s supposed to be a guilty pleasure. By all means I should have enjoyed the program — facilitating the experience were Sapporo Ichiban Beef Flavored Ramen and C++: The Core Language. (For the unaware, television, ramen, and computer programming are a geek’s holy trinity)

Yet if it weren’t for the ramen and the C++, dare I say that watching 15 minutes of Laguna Beach would have brought me negative utility! Even after removing the embarassment factor of revealing to all passersby that I felt the urge to watch this teenage-girl-targeted faux-reality TV show, I still would have enjoyed another blubbering MAD TV rerun over this programming. Damn! What went wrong?

The trouble with Laguna Beach is that, as far as I can tell, nothing actually happens during the show. I may not have been paying close enough attention, but I don’t recall whether any characters made any appearances. From time to time, I could hear the sound of concurrent female whines emanating from the television speaker — shall we refer to these sounds as dialogue? Okay, I’ll cede that point. Occasionally I heard some dialogue.

Analysis of this “dialogue” led me to several conclusions:

  • The directors told the actresses to ad lib their conversation
  • The actresses are not very smart

Laguna Beach is no guilty pleasure. It doesn’t give you that good pain feeling. It doesn’t even give you that bad pain feeling, since at least bad pain captures your attention. This show is just boring.

Netscape Browser Prototype is Insecure

Wednesday, December 1st, 2004

Just letting everyone know: the new browser prototype issued by “Netscape”, which is based on Firefox 0.9.3, does not include any security updates created since that release. Don’t install it on friends’ computers and don’t use it on untrusted sites.

Even worse, users are reporting that it embeds IE via a plugin accessible to any website. That makes it vulnerable to both 0.9.3 and IE security holes.

You can verify yourself by checking the Mozilla Known Vulnerabilities page with the “Netscape Browser”. Click on a recent bug number and run its testcase. (For example, the Javascript clipboard access testcase worked, and the extremely wide BMP crashed the browser) You can also watch a random website embed IE by visiting this example. Users of the latest Firefox release may click all of these links in confidence.

Outsourcing and the Dollar

Wednesday, December 1st, 2004

The latest fad among those economics types is discussing the state of the American Dollar. As it stands, The U.S. is importing way more than it’s exporting — around 5% of GDP. We call that the current account balance. In order for us to have a negative current account balance, which means basically buying much more than we sell, we need to take on loans from other countries.

Much of our current account deficit is financed by Asian countries, which intervene in the currency markets to keep the American dollar artificially strong and their currencies artificially weak. From the American consumer’s standpoint, this process makes Asian goods artificially cheap. From the Asian consumer’s standpoint, American goods then become artificially expensive. The American producer likewise has a hard time selling to Asian markets, but the Asian producer has an easy time selling to American markets.

American “overconsumption” is financed by foreign countries, and at some point, they will begin to cash out. As countries shy away from American investment, the dollar will weaken against foreign currencies. As the dollar weakens, American products will cost less for foreigners, while foreign products will cost more for Americans. That’s how the current account deficit begins to correct itself. Which brings us to outsourcing.

An artificially strong dollar does not just make American goods unattractive to foreigners — it also makes American workers unattractive to foreign businesses. American workers seem more expensive when the dollar is artificially strong. The reverse is true as well: the strong dollar makes foreign workers seem more attractive to American businesses. As it stands, American companies have been moving parts of their operations to foreign countries, taking advantage of cheaper labor abroad. A weakening dollar could stem, stop, or completely reverse the flow of jobs overseas (if such a flow even exists).

Let’s pretend that foreign countries stop intervening to keep the dollar strong. We start:

US$1 = 50 Indian Rupees
American worker: $50,000/yr salary (R2,500,000)
Indian worker: R500,000/yr salary ($10,000)
American pay:Indian pay = 5:1

Panic! Panic! Massive dollar selloffs. Now the American currency depreciates by a factor of 2:

US$1 = 25 Indian Rupees
American worker: $50,000/yr salary (R1,250,000)
Indian worker: R500,000/yr salary ($20,000)
American pay:Indian pay = 2.5:1

Suddenly foreign labor becomes twice as expensive, and American labor becomes two times cheaper. Outsourcing looks like a much less attractive option to the CEO, and the jobs never leave the shores. Could a weakening dollar make outsourcing irrelevant?